Title: For the heck of it...
Description: Communism...
DangerousNate - June 24, 2010 08:43 PM (GMT)
Share with me your opinions!
If you like it, explain, not like, explain. (30 points)
Remember, there are no stupid questions! Just inquisitive idiots! Which is why I'm doing this!
Dunkum - June 24, 2010 09:14 PM (GMT)
i'll yield the floor to people who are more well versed in thsi sort of thing (not having taken a single poli sci class in my 4 years of college, thatd be just about anyone) but i will also recommend that you post your own thoughts on the subject, to get the ball rolling so to speak
Belschaft - June 24, 2010 11:09 PM (GMT)
I really can't be arsed. I've got a vague idea of where you currently stand vis an understanding of communism, and just how major a task adequately explaining communism to you would be, and to be frank I have better things to do.
Instead I will simply link to
the font of all knowledge. If that interests you, perhaps read
the Communist Manifesto.
DangerousNate - June 25, 2010 01:42 AM (GMT)
That will do for now sir...
Shades Of Gray - June 28, 2010 06:07 PM (GMT)
I endorse reading the Communist Manifesto. While I don't agree with all the concepts of Communism, mostly because I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail, it is an interesting read.
Belschaft - June 28, 2010 06:41 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) |
| I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
Shades Of Gray - June 28, 2010 06:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
I like Nietzsche. His philosophies are the closest I can come to relating to. Frankly I feel pessimism is the only accurate way to look at the world. Optimism actually revolts me.
As I said, I think the Manifesto is an interesting read. I just think humans are inherently flawed. Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
Dunkum - June 28, 2010 08:06 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 02:57 PM) |
| Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. |
I tend to have to agree with this, its just teh way things are. and even the most rigorous system is likely to have a loophole in it somewhere
Shades Of Gray - June 28, 2010 08:10 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 04:06 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 02:57 PM) | | Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. |
I tend to have to agree with this, its just teh way things are. and even the most rigorous system is likely to have a loophole in it somewhere
|
There has to be a loophole. No system is flawless... as has been proven many times.
Dunkum - June 28, 2010 08:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 04:10 PM) |
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 04:06 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 02:57 PM) | | Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. |
I tend to have to agree with this, its just teh way things are. and even the most rigorous system is likely to have a loophole in it somewhere
|
There has to be a loophole. No system is flawless... as has been proven many times.
|
im almost certain that has been proven mathematically
Belschaft - June 28, 2010 08:28 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
Dunkum - June 28, 2010 08:31 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
in marx's model isnt there no central govt at all? i cant remember and was never 100% educated in it all (poli sci type stuff is not so interesting to me) but i seem to remember that being the case
Yev - June 28, 2010 08:33 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
Until someone decides to become the position of power and has enough sycophants, idiots, and goons to enforce said decision.
This, however, is a flaw in every political system.
Belschaft - June 28, 2010 09:27 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 11:31 AM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
in marx's model isnt there no central govt at all? i cant remember and was never 100% educated in it all (poli sci type stuff is not so interesting to me) but i seem to remember that being the case
|
Nope. No central government. No real government at all.
Shades Of Gray - June 28, 2010 10:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 05:27 PM) |
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 11:31 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
in marx's model isnt there no central govt at all? i cant remember and was never 100% educated in it all (poli sci type stuff is not so interesting to me) but i seem to remember that being the case
|
Nope. No central government. No real government at all.
|
Which is another reason why it can't work. Sooner or later someone is going to start running things in a small fashion. It may be a task that no one really wants, but once you gain a foothold, it's easier to take more.
Dunkum - June 28, 2010 10:34 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 06:16 PM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 05:27 PM) | | QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 11:31 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
in marx's model isnt there no central govt at all? i cant remember and was never 100% educated in it all (poli sci type stuff is not so interesting to me) but i seem to remember that being the case
|
Nope. No central government. No real government at all.
|
Which is another reason why it can't work. Sooner or later someone is going to start running things in a small fashion. It may be a task that no one really wants, but once you gain a foothold, it's easier to take more.
|
the point i was going to make. without central authority, someone will gain strength and create authority, and then the system crumbles
Belschaft - June 28, 2010 11:16 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 01:34 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 06:16 PM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 05:27 PM) | | QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 11:31 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 04:28 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:57 AM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 28 2010, 02:41 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 28 2010, 09:07 AM) | | I feel that any philosophy that requires some goodwill/optimism is doomed to fail |
Pessimistic much? You'd probably like Nietzsche.
Obviously communism remains flawed, but I argue that it is because society is not yet advanced enough yet to provide a 10 percentile standard of living for everyone. Enlightened self interest is conceivably a reason to embrace communism, should society develop to the required level to maintain the system as intended by Marx.
|
Someone will sooner or later take advantage of any system. I say this because I know I sure as hell would if placed in a position of true power.
|
Which is part of the reason why in Marx's model there is no position of power.
|
in marx's model isnt there no central govt at all? i cant remember and was never 100% educated in it all (poli sci type stuff is not so interesting to me) but i seem to remember that being the case
|
Nope. No central government. No real government at all.
|
Which is another reason why it can't work. Sooner or later someone is going to start running things in a small fashion. It may be a task that no one really wants, but once you gain a foothold, it's easier to take more.
|
the point i was going to make. without central authority, someone will gain strength and create authority, and then the system crumbles
|
Marx didn't think so. He saw society developing along an entirely co-operative path. With everyone having access to everything they need there is no conflict. With universal education - and very good education at that - there is no longer a desire for unnecessary luxuries. Due to high levels of industrialisation the population is practically freed from work, and with endless leisure time is free to enjoy life and embrace the family, nature and community. No one attempts to seize power as they have nothing to gain form it, and are contented.
Sure it's utopian, but that's the point. Communism is a goal to strive for, as we work towards collective improvement. It's not something we're going to mange any time soon if ever, but as an ideal it is perfect.
Dunkum - June 29, 2010 12:31 AM (GMT)
if youre an optimist. dont get me wrong, i agree with the sentiment, but i also agree with sog's assessment of humanity. sooner or later, someone would want more, and without central authority to oppose them, would gather up like-minded fellows and take it.
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 04:04 AM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Dunkum @ Jun 28 2010, 08:31 PM) |
| if youre an optimist. dont get me wrong, i agree with the sentiment, but i also agree with sog's assessment of humanity. sooner or later, someone would want more, and without central authority to oppose them, would gather up like-minded fellows and take it. |
That.
Also, it seems to me, maybe it's because haven't had time to read up on the subject (forgive me), but with Marxism (and communism for that matter), you life is to only provide for yourself and to do better for the collective.
There is no time for much else, your life is to follow, improve, and be a part of the collective (or government), without these your life is pointless and you shouldn't seek other things.
In a way, marxism/communism is almost a religion, or a strive towards that utopia on this planet by following this path.
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 01:25 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (DangerousNate @ Jun 28 2010, 07:04 PM) |
Also, it seems to me, maybe it's because haven't had time to read up on the subject (forgive me), but with Marxism (and communism for that matter), you life is to only provide for yourself and to do better for the collective.
There is no time for much else, your life is to follow, improve, and be a part of the collective (or government), without these your life is pointless and you shouldn't seek other things. |
Nope, very wrong.
To quote form wikipedia quoting from Marx (saves me from thumbing through a book to find something suitable) - "In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic."
Your life is actually far less constrained than it is now in a capitalist society, as fair and equal distribution of goods combined with industrialization and co-operativism means that you will be required to work for the communal good (including your own I should point out) but for less time than you do now, when you work for your own - and your superiors - good. You then can do whatever you want as long as it does not harm others or society. You could work at collective self improvement (learn to read French. Build a community centre. Teach a class in whatever you know to help others learn) or enjoy your leisure time however else you feel like doing so. Take a walk. Play sports. Read. Watch a film.
Your thinking of a dictatorship of the proletariat, ie: the USSR. For the record, and to avoid this problem in the future, any state that as so far claimed to bee communist was not.
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 09:10 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 09:25 AM) |
| QUOTE (DangerousNate @ Jun 28 2010, 07:04 PM) | Also, it seems to me, maybe it's because haven't had time to read up on the subject (forgive me), but with Marxism (and communism for that matter), you life is to only provide for yourself and to do better for the collective.
There is no time for much else, your life is to follow, improve, and be a part of the collective (or government), without these your life is pointless and you shouldn't seek other things. |
Nope, very wrong.
To quote form wikipedia quoting from Marx (saves me from thumbing through a book to find something suitable) - "In communist society, where nobody has one exclusive sphere of activity but each can become accomplished in any branch he wishes, society regulates the general production and thus makes it possible for me to do one thing today and another tomorrow, to hunt in the morning, fish in the afternoon, rear cattle in the evening, criticise after dinner, just as I have a mind, without ever becoming hunter, fisherman, herdsman or critic."
Your life is actually far less constrained than it is now in a capitalist society, as fair and equal distribution of goods combined with industrialization and co-operativism means that you will be required to work for the communal good (including your own I should point out) but for less time than you do now, when you work for your own - and your superiors - good. You then can do whatever you want as long as it does not harm others or society. You could work at collective self improvement (learn to read French. Build a community centre. Teach a class in whatever you know to help others learn) or enjoy your leisure time however else you feel like doing so. Take a walk. Play sports. Read. Watch a film.
Your thinking of a dictatorship of the proletariat, ie: the USSR. For the record, and to avoid this problem in the future, any state that as so far claimed to bee communist was not.
|
Ah... I see now.
At least Marx had a good idea going for him, or at least it sounds good in theory. I'll have ot read up on the subject before taking this further though, and yes you are right, I was thinking more communist than Marx in that regard of the state being everything.
I also hope it doesn't seem like it's you versus everyone on this view Bel, even if we hate each other's opinion on this at the end of this, I still like you.
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 09:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (DangerousNate @ Jun 29 2010, 12:10 PM) |
| I was thinking more communist than Marx in that regard of the state being everything. |
Not more communist. You just don't understand communism and are confusing it with something very different.
And I'd never transfer a dislike of your political positions to you personally. It's not your fault your hideously misinformed :)
Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American.
Shades Of Gray - June 29, 2010 10:46 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) |
| Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 10:49 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:46 PM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) | | Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
|
Don't make me assign you to a Peoples Health and Leisure Camp <_<
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 10:57 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 06:49 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:46 PM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) | | Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
|
Don't make me assign you to a Peoples Health and Leisure Camp <_<
|
:lol: Be careful, he'd like that. Or that what you had in mind? XD
Shades Of Gray - June 29, 2010 10:59 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 06:49 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:46 PM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) | | Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
|
Don't make me assign you to a Peoples Health and Leisure Camp <_<
|
*Starts packing bags.*
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 11:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 06:59 PM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 06:49 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:46 PM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) | | Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
|
Don't make me assign you to a Peoples Health and Leisure Camp <_<
|
*Starts packing bags.*
|
:o :lol: B)
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 11:03 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:59 PM) |
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 06:49 PM) | | QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 01:46 PM) | | QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 05:57 PM) | | Besides, your not an arse and show interest in learning about new ideas/concepts rather than simply decrying them as 'evil commie-fascism!'. You haven't refereed to death panels a single time, witch I always consider to be a good sign when discussing socialism with an American. |
That's because you're full of evil commie-fascism! If I had my way, we'd lynch you here! :angry:
|
Don't make me assign you to a Peoples Health and Leisure Camp <_<
|
*Starts packing bags.*
|
Really? Splendid.
Here are a few pictures of citizens enjoying a holiday at Peoples Health and Leisure Camp 13.



It comes highly recommended :)
Dunkum - June 29, 2010 11:05 PM (GMT)
its like that spa that hermes went to
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 11:06 PM (GMT)
Wow... This got dark fast...
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 11:11 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (DangerousNate @ Jun 29 2010, 02:06 PM) |
| Wow... This got dark fast... |
What exactly did you think I was referring to when I said Peoples Health and Leisure Camp, in response to a post mock-accusing me of being an 'evil commie-facist'? Butlins? How did you not get the blatant use of
Doublespeak while refering to the
Super Fun Happy Slave Labour Camp Of Doom? What else could I be referring to aside form a frickin gulag?
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 11:12 PM (GMT)
I knew, I just didn't think you'd actually post pictures. XD
Shades Of Gray - June 29, 2010 11:13 PM (GMT)
I'll enjoy my trip as I have every intention of destroying it from the inside... along with all the other "residents."
*Insert evil laughter here.*
Belschaft - June 29, 2010 11:18 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 02:13 PM) |
I'll enjoy my trip as I have every intention of destroying it from the inside... along with all the other "residents."
*Insert evil laughter here.* |
Revisionism is looked upon with some displeasure by the camps ever friendly Events and Activities Officers, who will see to it that you have a fun, fulfilling and productive stay.
DangerousNate - June 29, 2010 11:22 PM (GMT)
| QUOTE (Belschaft @ Jun 29 2010, 07:18 PM) |
| QUOTE (Shades Of Gray @ Jun 29 2010, 02:13 PM) | I'll enjoy my trip as I have every intention of destroying it from the inside... along with all the other "residents."
*Insert evil laughter here.* |
Revisionism is looked upon with some displeasure by the camps ever friendly Events and Activities Officers, who will see to it that you have a fun, fulfilling and productive stay.
|
:lol:
This is very amusing... :)
Demonic Gophers - June 30, 2010 12:46 AM (GMT)
*Digs spy tunnel to watch the excitement.*
Shades Of Gray - June 30, 2010 01:24 AM (GMT)
Demonic Gophers - June 30, 2010 01:34 AM (GMT)
DangerousNate - June 30, 2010 03:18 AM (GMT)
Ahh...even the debate topic is not safe from the SSA off-topicness...
Demonic Gophers - June 30, 2010 04:07 AM (GMT)
Especially not when the subject is politics.