Global Warming is Real, and nowhere more real than the Arctic

[Ayeshalan]

An article from the AP newswire. A lot of the major outlets are reporting on this story, including all of the "big three" networks and CNN, but not Fox News. Heck, Fox News doesn't even have a science or technology section on its web page. Does this surprise any of us?

Scientists Find Arctic Warming Quickly
Mon Nov 8,11:40 AM ET Science - AP

By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Scientists say changes in the earth's climate from human influences are occurring particularly intensely in the Arctic region, evidenced by widespread melting of glaciers, thinning sea ice and rising permafrost temperatures.

A study released Monday said the annual average amount of sea ice in the Arctic has decreased by about 8 percent in the past 30 years, resulting in the loss of 386,100 square miles of sea ice — an area bigger than Texas and Arizona combined.

"The polar regions are essentially the earth's air conditioner," Michael McCracken, president of the International Association of Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences, told a news conference Monday. "Imagine the earth having a less efficient air conditioner."

Susan Joy Hassol, the report's lead author, said the Arctic probably would warm twice as much as the Earth. A region of extreme light and temperature changes, the Arctic's surfaces of ice, ocean water, vegetation and soil are important in reflecting the sun's heat.

Pointing to the report as a clear signal that global warming is real, Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., said Monday the "dire consequences" of warming in the Arctic underscore the need for their proposal to require U.S. cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases. President Bush has rejected that approach.

In the past half-century, average yearly temperatures in Alaska and Siberia rose by about 3.6 degrees to 5.4 degrees Fahrenheit and winters in Alaska and western Canada warmed by an average of 5 degrees to 7 degrees Fahrenheit.

With "some of the most rapid and severe climate change on earth," the Arctic regions' melting contributed to sea levels rising globally by an average of about three inches in the past 20 years, the report said.

"These changes in the Arctic provide an early indication of the environmental and societal significance of global warming," says the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment, a four-year study by 300 scientists in eight Arctic-bordering nations, including the United States.

This most comprehensive study of Arctic warming to date adds yet more impetus to the projections by many of the world's climate scientists that there will be a steady rise in global temperature as the result of greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere from the burning of fossil fuels and other sources.

It is based on ice core samples and other evidence of climate conditions such as on-the-ground and satellite measurements of surface air temperatures. Nations participating in the study besides the United States are Canada, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, Russia and Sweden.

"The bottom line is that the Arctic is warming now, much more rapidly than the rest of the globe, and it's impacting people directly," Robert Corell, chairman of the scientists' study panel and a senior fellow with the American Meteorological Society, said Sunday.

The process is only likely to accelerate in the Arctic, a region that provides important resources such as oil, gas and fish, the study finds.

That would wreak havoc on polar bears, ice-dependent seals, caribou and reindeer herds — and local people such as Inuit whose main food source comes from hunting those animals. Some endangered migratory birds are projected to lose more than half their breeding areas.

The study projects that in the next 100 years the yearly average temperatures will increase by 7 to 13 degrees Fahrenheit over land and 13 to 18 degrees over the ocean, mainly because the water absorbs more heat.

Forests would expand into the Arctic tundra, which in turn would expand into the polar ice deserts, because rising temperatures would favor taller, denser vegetation. The areas of Arctic tundra would shrink to their smallest extent since 21,000 years ago when, humans began emerging from the last Ice Age.

Sea levels globally already are expected to rise between another four inches to three feet or more this century. Longer term, sea levels would rise alarmingly if temperatures continue to rise unabated, in the range of 5 degrees to 11 degrees Fahrenheit over the next several centuries.

In that scenario, the study projects "a virtually complete melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet," which would contribute as much as 23 feet to the world's sea level rise.

Arctic Climate Impact Assessment: http://www.acia.uaf.edu

[mommypuck]

Climate Experts Respond to Arctic Climate Impact Assessment

I think this might be to long to post here, however it’s worth the read... if you don’t mind the statistics.

Synopsis if you get bogged down:

A group of experts (names, degrees, and positions listed at the bottom of the article) responding to the Arctic Climate Impact Assessment (ACIA), are bombarding Senator McCain (R-AZ Chairman of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee) with information opposing points put forward in the ACIA. These experts also propose that rather than “alarming” people the science should be advanced; because over the last 15,000 years there has been drastic climate change , and there will continue to be drastic climate change over the next 15,000 years. While I agree that advances need to be made in climatology, and now is a good a time as any; in my humble opinion 15,000 years ago humankind was not dumping anything bigger than occasional hot turd into its watersheds. As for the air, while there have always been volcanoes, and forest fires. Adding to those today’s number of cars and industry, there is a big difference from 15,000 years ago with a few hundred thousand cook fires.

[Admiral Rican]

No SERIOUS climatologist thinks the rate of current globle warming is normal. It's the reason 48 Nobel Prize-winning scientists voted for Kerry. Not ONE came out supporting Bush.

We have evidence from greenland ice cores dating back 150,000 years that our climate is warming abnormally. I don't think the scientists are "Alarming". IMHO, I think the scientist are not alarming enough.